Nobody needs three seders. God seems to think two are enough. Yet this Sunday, the third night of Passover, I will attend a third seder— a feminist seder—for the 37th year in a row, because I have come to feel that the holiday is incomplete without it.
Why is this night different from all other nights?
Because on this night our service is drawn from the feminist Haggadah written by the late Esther Broner with Naomi Nimrod, which includes lines like, “We were told that we were brought out of Egypt from the house of bondage, but we were still our fathers’ daughters, obedient wives, and servers of our children, and were not yet ourselves.”
On this night, we become ourselves.
On this night, 20 or so women sit on pillows on the floor at a seder “table” spread with all the traditional foods and symbols, except that there’s an orange on the seder plate—a feminist rebuttal to the rabbi who once said, “A woman belongs on the bimah [platform in a synagogue where the Torah is read] like an orange belongs on the seder plate.”
On this night, after each of us introduces herself by her matrilineage (“I am Letty, daughter of Ceil, daughter of Jenny, alias Shayndel”), we bring into our midst the mothers and grandmothers who cooked and served but never reclined, and the millions more women in the texts and history of the Jewish people who are unseen, unsung, and unnamed.
On this night, we all recline. We wash each other’s hands. We ask the Four Questions of women. One year one question was, “Why did my brother get a fancy bar mitzvah in a hotel ballroom when I got a little kiddush [blessing over the wine] and sponge cake in the synagogue basement?” We recite the Plagues of Women—of which there are always more than 10— and we speak about the Four Daughters, female archetypes who yearn to know about their past.
On this night, not one but two goblets stand at the center of our table—Elijah’s cup, heralding our ultimate redemption and filled, as always, with wine, and Miriam’s cup, symbolizing sustenance and filled with water, the source of life.
Our Haggadah (order of service) gives proper credit to Moses’s sister, Miriam, the prophetess who led the Israelite women across the Red Sea with timbrels and with song.
According to a famous midrash (rabbinic commentary), when the Pharaoh condemned Jewish babies to death, Miriam’s father lost all hope for the future and stopped cohabiting with Miriam’s mother. Though only 7 years old, Miriam argued for life. She convinced her parents to stay together and to continue having children. The result was the birth of Moses.
Moreover, it was Miriam who placed her baby brother in a basket in the bulrushes, and when the Pharoah’s daughter found him, it was Miriam who put forward the baby’s own mother as his wet-nurse. The traditional telling of the Passover story barely mentions Miriam, but on this night we thank her for transgressing the boundaries of female submissiveness. We bring her to life, this rebel and visionary, for without Miriam there would have been no Moses.
Besides Miriam there are other boldly disobedient women to whom we owe the life of Moses and the destiny of the Jewish people. We honor Shifrah and Puah, the midwives who, by delivering Moses, violated the Pharaoh’s order to murder all first-born Jewish sons; and Yocheved, Moses’s mother, who gave up her baby so that he might survive; and Batya, the Pharaoh’s daughter, a righteous Gentile who disobeyed her father’s decree and adopted a Hebrew boy who’d been marked for murder.
At the feminist seder, we don’t praise good girls, we praise rebellious women, wise women, quiet heroines, and brash leaders. We laud scholars of the rabbinic period, entrepreneurial women of the Middle Ages, modern women suffragists, union organizers, martyrs of the Holocaust, anti-war protestors, civil rights workers, poets, stalwarts of the women’s movement.
Typically, a small group of us (the “Seder Sisters”) starts the planning process about two months ahead. We choose the seder’s theme (the topic about which all participants will speak in turn) and we hand out food assignments. (In 1979, according to my notes, Gloria Steinem brought the Manischewitz wine and Bella Abzug, the fiery Congresswoman in the wide-brimmed hats, brought the chicken.)
In 1990, our theme was “Omission, Absence, and Silence,” by which we meant men’s silencing of women and women’s self-censorship. Another year it was “Our Mentors,” a nod to those who had influenced our development as women or as Jews. On the seder’s seventh anniversary, we talked about the power of sevens in our faith tradition and in our lives.
One of my favorite themes was “Our Personal Chametz”—the stuff women have to get rid of before we can “pass over” into freedom. As each participant called out her chametz (self-deprecation, loneliness, passivity, jealousy, obsession with body image, shyness, fear of failure) she poured a little grain whisky from a beaker into a large pan and when the pan was full, we set the liquid aflame, symbolically burning the behaviors that hobble us and hold us back.
This year’s theme, “Honoring our [Seder] Mothers: Shaping and Reshaping the Future,” will, I’m sure, inspire encomiums to different women who mothered us into being, but foremost among them will be our beloved seder leader and co-founding seder mother, Esther Broner, who died in June.
Writer, playwright, social-justice activist, inventor of rituals, Esther was not just the co-author of its Hagaddah, she was our spiritual guru, the creator of our seder order, the high priestess who sat at the head of the table in her long white robe and embroidered kippa (skullcap), who blessed us with her sparkly wands and whispery incantations, who led us out of mitzrayim (Egypt, the narrow place) and made us feel strong and whole.
At the end of every seder, we always stand in a circle, wrap ourselves in a motley-looking rope of tied-together lavender fabric scraps which we call “the sacred shmatta,” and sing a song of peace. After Bella died, we added two rituals to bring her presence into our circle: We put a big-brimmed hat on an empty chair and we sing “Tayere Malke” (Dear Queen), the Yiddish drinking song she loved.
This year, I’m not sure what ritual we will devise to honor the irreplaceable Esther—maybe we’ll pull up a second empty chair and put Esther’s embroidered kippa on it. Then again, the entire enterprise is her memorial, for without Esther I doubt that our seder would have survived 37 years. From now on it’s up to us to keep alive her proud affirmation that Passover is also about us.
Winstead, the acclaimed comedian and co-creator of The Daily Show, was addressing a roomful of her peers. One was the first woman to win a Tony for direction in musical theater, one had just received an Academy Award nomination, another had created NBC’s newest hit comedy. It was opening night of the Second Annual Athena Film Festival, and these women were about to receive awards that ”recognize extraordinary women for their leadership and creative accomplishments.”
The festival, which ran February 9 to 12, came a few weeks after a disappointing round of Oscar nominations that featured no woman Best Director nominees and spotty results for women elsewhere; a panel in which a top Hollywood director was quoted by none other than George Clooney as refusing to cast an actress with whom he did not want to have sex; and the newest University of California study on gender inequality in Hollywood, which reported that “male roles far outweigh those for women, females are far more likely to be scantily dressed,” and the gender of films’ creators had an impact on all of it. After the study’s release Stacy L. Smith, professor at USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism, issued a call to action via the Los Angeles Times: ”Females represent half of the population and half of moviegoing audiences, but they don’t hit a third of the characters. Male consumers aren’t the only ones going to the movies, but our cultural storytellers today are male.”
It was to change that bleak picture that the Athena Film Festival was established last year by Barnard’s Athena Center for Leadership Studies, in partnership with the nonprofit Women and Hollywood. Athena Center director Kathryn Kolbert and Women and Hollywood’s Melissa Silverstein were on hand at awards night, and WVFC favorites Katie Couric and Gloria Steinem were present to introduce the five inaugural awardees. Each so honored, in turn, was asked to name a woman whose inspiration and support had been key to her success.
Theresa Rebeck—whose “Excellence as a Playwright and Author of Films, Books and Television” includes Seminar, currently on Broadway; co-authorship of the Pulitzer-nominated Omnium Gatherum; and years writing and producing Law & Order and NYPD Blue as well as the current Smash—named another group of honorees: Diablo Cody, Dana Fox, Liz Meriwether, and Lorene Scafaria. The group of friends and colleagues, known as “the Fempire, was honored for “Their Creativity and Sisterhood.” They couldn’t be present to receive the awards in person because “we are working our butts off in this male-dominated industry,” they wrote in a message.
Rachael Horovitz, honored ”for her Exceptional Talents as a Motion Picture Producer,” from HBO’s Grey Gardens to the Oscar-nominated Moneyball, named as her inspirer 92-year-old Priscilla Morgan, who, with her husband, composer Gian-Carlo Menotti, worked to bring the Spoleto Festival to the United States. As an agent in the 1950s, Morgan represented Arthur Penn, John Frankenheimer, and others on Broadway and NBC’s pioneering Philco Playhouse on TV. Horovitz met Morgan “when I was 5 years old and she came with my father to Spoleto,” Horovitz said. “She couldn’t be here, but she has inspired me ever since.”
Dee Rees, director of the new film Pariah and chosen with producer Nekisa Cooper for “Impact as Emerging Filmmakers,” named her Liberian grandmother for her survival, while Cooper gave a shout to Ava duVernay, filmmaker and founder of AFFRM, the African-American Film Festival Releasing Movement. “She left a successful career in public relations, ” Cooper said, “has made TWO award-winning films already, and she has helped so many of us. She is not only my friend—she is really, truly a model.”
Next, honored for “Her Vision and Courage as an Exemplary Director,” was Julie Taymor, introduced by Gloria Steinem as ”the first person about whom I spontaneously used the word genius.” Steinem added that Taymor “is a joy to work with” and that “she has brought the world together” with travels to create productions in Japan, Africa and elsewhere. Taymor herself named multiple inspiring women, including Frida producer Sarah Green and Lynn Hendee, who stayed with Taymor and The Tempest and “was there in Hawaii when we ran out of money and couldn’t even afford to do the tempest!” Another was the late Laura Ziskin, “who pulled together the money for the movie I am working on now,” and was also the namesake for the evening’s last award: the “Laura Ziskin Lifetime Achievement Award.”
To introduce the latter was Couric, who had worked with the venerable Ziskin on one of her last big productions, the creation of Stand Up for Cancer. ”Laura told me,” said Couric, that “‘in the 1980s AIDS activists brought all of their game to the fight. That’s what we have to do now.’ In September 2008,” Couric added. ”we brought all three networks together and raised millions. That was Laura. She lived and fought until the day she died.”
Accepting the award, Ziskin’s daughter reflected that when she started in 1978, Ziskin “was often the only woman in the room . . . she had to look a little deeper. That’s how she found Fight Club: she didn’t accept the word no.”
For the next four days, the festival would continue in that same spirit, with panels, screenings, and brainstorming sessions in which veterans offered tips to emerging or aspiring filmmakers. BriAnna Olson, currently directing short commercial films like this GemGirls music video featured on NPR, was thrilled with Friday’s panel “From Script to Screen,” featuring Pariah’s Nekisa Cooper, Precious producer Lisa Cortes, and Mary Jane Skalski (The Station Agent), among others.
“It was fabulous,” Olson told me. “I learned a lot, and it was great feeling to be part of something larger—that there’s not this huge gap between me and the film world.”
Still to come: Film reviews and more festival details, including how Gloria Steinem stopped hating the HBO film about her.
Anita Hill stood onstage and waited for the standing ovation to end. It took awhile: Hunter College’s auditorium was crammed with women, ages 15 to 75.
Some were the same age that Hill was in 1991, when she came forward to testify in the Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas. Others had been at her side, or among the millions watching the young law professor talk about unwanted sexual advances by her former supervisor. And still others had been too young to hear her then, but came to honor and learn from a pioneer for justice.Asked by Harvard professor Patricia Williams, “When did you realize this was a moment beyond just the moment?” Hill talked about her last appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee: “At the end of my testimony, [civil rights attorney] John Frank came up to me in tears, saying, “I know this is hard, but you have no idea how important this is to our country.”
The conversation between Hill and Williams came during the conference “Sex, Power and Speaking Truth: Anita Hill 20 Years Later,” presented at Hunter College on October 15. The point made by John Frank was demonstrated by the day’s four panels, which discussed in turn the events of 1991, its s effects on the law, and the challenges to come. Along the way, many saluted two other women, both of them African Americans, who preceded Hill in exposing workplace sexual harassment: Paulette Barnes, who brought the first civil suit against her supervisor at the EPA in 1974, and Mechelle Vinson, whose case against Mentor Savings finally removed such employer behavior from the realm of “personal matters” and into the jurisdiction of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
However, commented University of Michigan professor Catherine MacKinnon (right), such harassment was still sotto voce until those 1991 hearings.
Only then did it become real to the American public, MacKinnon said as the conference began. “My book in 1979 [Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination, Yale University Press] didn’t do that. The 1981 EEOC guidelines didn’t do it,” MacKinnon explained. “But Anita Hill did it. After the hearings, sexual harassment complaints across the nation tripled. And even years after, women believed her with ferocity, and continued to do so after time and heat passed.”
They still do, said Ms. magazine co-founder Letty Cottin Pogrebin, the event’s co-chair. Women flooded email boxes across the country last year when Justice Thomas’ wife Ginni demanded an apology from Hill after all these years. “We realized it wasn’t really over,” Cottin Pogrebin said.
In 1991, Tulane University’s Melissa Harris-Perry (left) was just beginning her sophomore year at Wake Forest University. Harris had just organized a residential community for black women, called Nia House, she said, so when the hearings began, “we were all watching together.” At the time, Harris-Perry added, “I also had to contend with the fact that my dear mentor, Maya Angelou, had just written a piece hoping that Clarence Thomas, who had been poor, might be good for our racial politics.”
What happened instead was the subject of much of the day, as panelists examined the complex intersection of race and gender that played out in Thomas’s nomination and succession to the bench.
Harris-Perry was referring to a piece that had been published in the Washington Post in August 1991, before a coalition of law professors of color persuaded Hill to testify. After she did,Thomas famously told the Senate Judiciary Committee that allowing her testimony amounted to “a high-tech lynching.”
The day Thomas made that statement, said Kimberle Crenshaw of Columbia University Law School, she left the Capitol and was “surrounded by African-American women praying. They were praying for an end to this threat to Thomas being named a Justice—the threat coming from Anita Hill! And our taxi driver, an African immigrant, nearly drove off the road gesturing about Hill’s betrayal of ‘our community.’”
The resulting split of constituencies was a minefield for opponents of the Thomas nomination, said Judith Resnik of Yale Law School. “Confidence was all about counting the votes,” Resnik said. “And we were not given enough time to educate Senators abou the issue.”
Since ascending to the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas’s impact has been keenly felt—most recently in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, said Hunter linguistics professor Virginia Vallian. “Just as in 1991 the Senate did not understand the realities for women in the workplace,” she said, “in 2011 the Court didn’t get the effects of rampant discrimination, how it actually manifests.”
The recent case of Nassifatou Diallo, whose charges against IMF director Dominique Strauss-Kahn stunned three countries, showed both the achievement and limitations of that wake-up call, panelists agreed.
Diallo benefited in one way from the sea change in attitudes since 1991: she knew what had happened to her was illegal. “It is because of Anita Hill’s example that a hotel worker knew that she had rights… and both have won in the court of public opinion,” said Gloria Steinem. “Clarence Thomas is on the Court, but Dominique Strauss-Kahn will not be president of France.”
Diallo “spoke for so many women in workplaces around the country,” said Ai-jen Poo of the National Domestic Workers Alliance, which works on behalf of the two million women who work as nannies ad caregivers. “The case being dropped says we have so much more work to do.”
Ideas about what to do next varied. Younger women talked of current harassment and the need for intergenerational strategies, others of educating men. Gloria Steinem proposed a new legal category, parallel to hate crimes. These “supremacy crimes,” Steinem said, would include sexual harassment, domestic violence, and “so-called senseless killings by men who go into a school or a restaurant or other public place,” like the recent massacre in Norway—whose offenders, “exclusively male and usually white, act out against challenges to their supremacy.”
Dr. Hill’s own suggestions involve a redefinition of ‘home,’ as she outlines in her new book, Reimagining Equality: Stories of Gender, Race, and Finding Home. Why ‘home,’ Williams asked. Hill cited Ken Burns, who has often said that he sees ‘home’ as a metaphor for equality. Hill extended the metaphor, describing ‘home’ as “a lens through which we can safely view the world.” That could mean safety from poverty, discrimination, or from trauma, as well as representing a physical home, she said. “Home is an ideal state of being, as much as a reality, which must be reimagined for each generation.”
In the book, Hill proposes a “Home Summit” for women and girls to shape the next stage of the battle. She leaned forward, toward the audience. “Can anyone take this to the White House Council on Women and Girls?”
These are just a few of the highlights of a powerful day. To hear more, go to the conference’s Web site . And let us know (in the comments below) if you’ve had an Anita Hill moment yourself, and what you think is most important to remember over the next 20 years.
This week’s blog assortment turned out purely aspirational, from an interview with Iran’s greatest living poet, to honors for Ada Lovelace Day, the country’s first computer programmer, to Anjelica Huston reflecting on what she knows now that she didn’t at 20.
- We’ve often featured Tish Jett’s A Femme d’un Certain Age, but we agree with WVFC’s Stacey Bewkes that this week Jett has outdone herself with Famous Faces of a Certain Age. Click over for iconic and new photos of Toni Morrison, Gloria Steinem, Brigitte Bardot, Dominique Sanda, and many others, well-narrated: “As Jacqueline pointed out yesterday, broaden the issue, ‘Let’s discuss what makes these women beautiful.’ Someone else said, ‘They are themselves with a vengeance.’ How great is that?”
- In her Fall Theater Review at Broadway & Me, Jan Simpson calls our attention to the latest work by one of our most beloved actors: “Linda Lavin passed on both the chance to play the showbiz trouper Hattie Walker who sings “Broadway Baby” in Follies and the role of the aunt in Other Desert Cities so that she could portray the mother in The Lyons, Nicky Silver’s new play about a family struggling to come to terms with the death of the husband and father who bound them together. Mark Brokaw is directing the play, which is being done at the Vineyard Theatre. I don’t know anything more about it than that. But if it’s good enough for the prodigiously talented Lavin to give up a shot at two Broadway shows, that’s more than good enough for me.”
- Did you know that this Friday is Ada Lovelace Day, dedicated to women in science, technology, engineering, and math? We just found out, and the birthday of the country’s first computer programmer is worth both a cheer and a push to embrace the next generation. At Big Think, Megan Ericksen asks the not-yet-obsolete question, “Where Are All the Women Scientists?” With video of First Lady Michelle Obama at the National Science Foundation, Ericksen says they’re not born without early encouragement: “Of course there’s nothing wrong with a long, financially-dependent life in the liberal arts, but there is something amiss when you’ve decided — or been told — that you’re just no good at math and science before you’ve hit fifteen. As teachers and parents will attest, whatever sociological forces are dividing women and men into paths as nurses or radiologists, daycare providers or professors, they are in full swing by high school.”
- We’re guessing that Jacki Lyden —WVFC contributor, NPR journalist, and author of Daughter of the Queen of Sheba — will be glad to to see Guernica Magazine‘s interview with Iran’s most prominent poet, two-time Nobel nominee, Simin Behbahāni, who speaks about “the greatest epic in history, the nightmare of censorship, and why her country will eventually achieve democracy.” The poet, writes interviewer Shiva Rahnbaran, “is optimistic about where Persian thought and literature are headed despite Iranian society’s many post-revolution disillusionments.”
- Also optimistic, it seems, is Anjelica Huston, who just gave a series of interviews at Style Goes Strong, the new style section of Life Goes Strong. In the second, she answers our perpetual question, What Do You Now Know That You Didn’t Know When You were 20? A lot, apparently: “I don’t think you want life to just be the same old, same old. You don’t want it to be old hat. I still want to feel my nerves sizzling. For instance, I just started on a new series called ‘Smash’ about Broadway and it’s filmed in NYC. I moved from California to New York and I’ll be in a brand new city for six or seven months of the year now… I’ve been living in California for the past 30 years. I took my dogs and moved into an apartment in New York. I can’t believe that I moved cross country! Life is changing very fast for me now, but at the same time it’s not a bad thing. All my friends are saying it’s good. Yes, it’s scary, but what I know now that I didn’t know when I was younger is that change is not a bad thing. It’s new and it’s good. You embrace your fears and you just do it.” Below, two clips — one of Huston’s dazzling 20-something debut in Prizzi’s Honor, and one talking about her new film, 50/50:
On Monday night, at 9 p.m. Eastern time, HBO will premiere its documentary Gloria: In Her Own Words, a chronicle of the life of one of WVFC’s most beloved power women, Gloria Steinem. The news is buzzing with commentary about Steinem for the occasion, including the TIME interview below. We love her common-sense response when asked about her personal beauty, and about her own age (77), including her expectation of at least 23 more years of raising hell.
The Wednesday Five: Erykah Badu Bares Her Soul, Skin-Deep Safety and Life After Alabama’s Tornadoes (VIDEO)
This week from the blogosphere: a glimpse of Alabama after tornadoes, a new database to make sure our cosmetics are safe, and what a Forbes blogger realized when she met Gloria Steinem.
- Among this week’s crush of news was the story of the tornadoes across the South, the most destructive in recorded history. New Orleans blogger Renee Claire has first-hand reporting from Tuscaloosa, Alabama, including some dramatic footage and useful suggestions about where we can give to help out.
- Wondering how to sort through warnings about chemicals in our skin care products and cosmetics? Try the Environmental Working Group’s national Skin Deep database, via our sister site Our Bodies, Our Blog. Click on the first link, writes the blog’s Rachel Walden, “You can browse by cosmetic category or search for the name of your favorite product to find out about possible hazards in terms of cancer risk, reproductive toxicities, and allergies. Information is also provided on companies’ animal testing policies. The directions and ingredients listed on each product label is listed, and links are provided to other similar product types and products from the same manufacturer.” OBOS also gives links to the database’s testing protocols.
- At WVFC, we know Janet Golden as an incisive writer and half of our celebrated Team Librarian pair of humorists. So we were both unsurprised and thrilled to find Janet’s wise commentary at History News Network, giving historical perspective on recent efforts in Maine to scale back child labor laws. With droll irony, she frames the trend on Maine as a modest proposal: “Maine could really be a model if it would just eliminate all restrictions on work. As one woman told investigators in 1919: ‘Once, before the child-labor law got so bad, little bits of kids, five to six years old, would get out and make more than the older ones.’ Imagine how great it would be if our five and six year olds could be doing their part and perhaps inspire their older siblings to buckle down. And aren’t we always complaining about kids needing to exercise and lose a few pounds? What’s better than getting up in the morning and walking to work and earning so little that you just don’t have money for junk food, or sometimes, any food?”
- Forbes.com isn’t where you usually look for a three-part series on “Why I Returned to the Women’s Movement.” At She Negotiates, Victoria Pynchon begins by narrating the recent premiere of D.A. Pennebaker’s film Jane, about Jane Fonda, at a fundraiser for the Women’s Media Center to describe her initial dismissal of feminism in the early Ms. Magazine days: “I didn’t want to be a woman lawyer. I wanted to be a lawyer.” By part III, of course, the outside world has taught her the usefulness of such distinctions, and the community it engenders.
- “What? Erykah Badu is 40?” That joyful yelp followed our discovery of this pointer on Racialicious to the revolutionary (if diminutive) singer’s spectacular and sexy VIBE Magazine cover. Badu, who turned 40 this year, compares the cover photo —in which she is naked except for a spectacular tattoo — to “traditional performance art like Yoko Ono, or Nina Simone. Research some of those women. They all seem to live by the same theme: Well-behaved women rarely make history. Even looking at people like Harriet Tubman and those types of women. When you have strong convictions about something you know what you already gonna do.” She also talks about the video below, in which her nudity is blurred but its message is not:
The Wednesday Five: Dressing Up for Staying In, Lessons for Midlife Moms Parenting Tweens, and Happy Birthday, Gloria Steinem! (VIDEO)
- What did you learn from Gloria Steinem, and when? The answers are still coming: see Shelby Knox’s On Her 77th Birthday, 7 Things I’ve Learned From Gloria Steinem. It’s worth reading in full, starting with the first rule, ‘Patriarchy is a relatively new mistake,’ and continuing to maxims like “If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, but you think it’s a pig… it’s a pig.” Self explanatory enough – trust yourself, always. For many of us marginalized people, we’ve been taught to do just the opposite. This is what oppressive forces want and something we must resist with all of our being.” Click the link to learn what Steinem and Knox mean by “We all need a chosen family” and perhaps most mysterious, “Ask the turtle.”
- We knew that we weren’t the only site saddened by the loss of Gerry Ferraro, or even the only one to respond with a video. Tennessee Guerilla Women has tons more–including her VP debate with George H.W. Bush–and we were also taken by the heartfelt response of New Deal 2.0′s Lynn Parramore. “I was just fourteen when Walter Mondale chose her as his running mate, and I recall thinking: ‘Wow! Who is this feisty woman on TV talking about the White House?!?’,” Parramore writes. “A woman running for vice president was something new and exciting. Everybody knew she had to be tough as nails and whip smart to navigate the minefields of such an unprecedented candidacy. What was more amazing than her poise was her plausibility. To hear her speak was to take her seriously. In fact, there were times when she seemed more plausible as a leader than the other candidate on her ticket. This was a woman who had been a mother, a lawyer, a successful Congresswoman. She was a tough-talking New Yorker, but the fact that she had stayed home until her kids were school age made it harder for conservatives to paint her as something unnatural and unwomanly.”
- When Alexandra MacAaron isn’t writing top-drawer culture pieces for WVFC, she’s either running her direct-marketing agency or running to keep up with her tween daughter, she tells us. And sometimes, she writes in her blog Lovin’ the Alien, both of the latter roles clash hard, as when her daughter takes her somewhere she’s obviously not the target audience. Like the mall, where she goes to buy her daughter jeans: “We escape from Abercrombie relatively unscathed — just the jeans, not a single graphic tee or hoodie. My daughter is elated. I’m a bit bewildered, but … I am not the target audience.” There is, however, some common ground, she writes: “Next, we track down the store Pink, a colorful, brightly lit shop of cotton undies, sleepwear and Betty Boop-inspired lingerie. …My daughter needs a strapless bra to wear under a sundress for an upcoming bat mitzvah. Styles change, but there are some things you can rely on. Whether you’re 13 or 48, you buy a strapless bra because you have to — not because it’s comfortable.” Though no midlife woman we know shops at Pink.
- Speaking of shopping for intimates, Deja Pseu of Une Femme guest blogs at A Woman of a Certain Age on an issue recently highlighted in our Sex Talks: lingerie. In “Dressing Up and Staying In,” Pseu helps zero in on the category’s sweet spot: “While there may be times that call for the full Frederick’s of Hollywood treatment, in those situations comfort is irrelevant as those pieces generally aren’t worn for an extended period of time. But in between naughty-wear and oversized cartoon character sleep shirts, there’s a middle ground I think of as allure, and it’s achievable on a regular basis. You can find sleepwear that’s comfortable, yet pretty enough to garner some favorable attention from that person on the other side of the bed.”
- In honor of the women suing Wal-Mart for pay discrimination, Melissa at Women and Hollywood suggests that we rent the newly released DVD of Made in Dagenham, the British film about a 1968 strike against Ford Motor Company by women in a UK plant. Regardless of your thoughts on massive class-action suits, we think it’s a good idea. Here’s a video clip to get you to your online rental queue or local video store.
Historically, people yawn through mid-term elections. But not this year. 2010 is the Year of the Outrageous—not the Year of the Woman, as some would have it. Yes, there are many women running, and they are attracting a great deal of attention. But this attention isn’t necessarily positive, and it doesn’t make traditional feminists happy.
I say “traditional” to distinguish them from conservative women candidates who have appropriated the feminist label, even as they campaign against programs that benefit women. Sharron Angle, for instance, campaigning for a Senate seat in Nevada, believes it is “right” for women to stay home with their children rather than venture out into the workplace. Campaigning in the primary, Angle said she’d like to see Social Security, the lifeline of almost half of all older women living alone, “transitioned out” to the private sector. Her advice to pregnant victims of rape or incest? Turn lemons into lemonade, because their pregnancies are part of “God’s plan.”
In 2008, I was very excited, as other feminists were, when a woman appeared to have an excellent shot at the presidency. In her campaign, Hillary Rodham Clinton made clear her positions on all the important issues, drawing on years of experience close to the center of power and on her skills as an attorney. She also believed it important to demonstrate through her demeanor that she had all the prized, traditionally “masculine” attributes, such as rationality, and none of the “feminine” baggage betrayed by the expression of emotion. Conventional wisdom held that a woman who wanted to do a “man’s job” had to suppress any sign that she wasn’t actually a man.
John McCain, looking to erode Clinton’s support among women, countered her essentially neutered persona by nominating Sarah Palin as his running mate. Palin displayed her femininity by capitalizing on her physical charms and keeping her children on stage with her as often as possible. It was very refreshing and affirming of womanhood for a candidate aspiring to high office to promote herself as a woman and not relegate her children to deep background or camouflage her breasts under a business suit.
But it was more complicated than that. McCain’s assumption that women vote with their vaginas was not only demeaning, it was patently untrue. The electorate in 2008 was 53 percent female, and 56 percent of those women voted for Obama. On the other hand, many men candidly admitted they were attracted by Palin’s sexuality. Her lack of preparation and experience was painfully apparent during interviews, inspiring not only many jokes but Tina Fey’s devastating impersonation. Palin revived the gendered stereotype of the sexy bimbo, even as Clinton validated the feminist ideal of the competent woman equal to any man. Yet Palin also demonstrated real political savvy, delivering prepared speeches with admirable aplomb, while Clinton’s apparently involuntary display of emotion in New Hampshire revived her flagging campaign. The 2008 election was a mixed bag for the feminist agenda.
“Name It, Change It” is a project intended to help women candidates succeed in this campaign season, with the ultimate goal of increasing the number of women in elective office. The Women’s Media Center has teamed up with the Women’s Campaign Forum and Political Parity to monitor the media coverage of women’s campaigns and identify and condemn instances of sexist commentary. A recent study has shown that such sexism not only can cost women an election, but discourages them from running at all. At the campaign’s launch last month, Women’s Media Center founder Gloria Steinem made it easy to identify sexism by applying the concept of reversibility: test the suspect phrase by applying it to the other gender. “Don’t say she’s just out of graduate school but he’s a rising star,” Steinem wrote. “Don’t say she has no professional training but he worked his way up.”
Even more familiar is the falling back on descriptions of a woman candidate’s appearance—her clothing, her hair, her (un)attractiveness—not her statements on policy. One egregious example: a widely circulated video that explicitly compares the physical attractiveness of conservative women to that of their liberal counterparts, against an audio track of the song “Pretty Woman” followed by “Who Let the Dogs Out?”
If the 2008 election was complicated in terms of gender politics, the 2010 midterms are exponentially more so. Tea Party women, exemplified by Sharron Angle (left) and Christine O’Donnell (below), are dominating the chatter of the punditocracy. Unquestionably, the largely mocking, 24/7 saturation coverage of these women has a sexist tinge, if only because the focus has been on, at least in O’Donnell’s case, strange things she said more than a decade ago. Why is so much written about her dabbling in witchcraft as a teenager? Why isn’t she being pressed to reveal and explain her current positions instead? Why is Bill Maher picking on her? Why is he not similarly tearing into, for example, Alvin Greene, the unemployed, indicted, come-from-nowhere senatorial wannabe from South Carolina? A brief moment in the limelight and poof! Greene’s off the radar.
Complicating O’Donnell’s situation are some of the opinions she’s expressed over the years—statements that are so far afield, they almost beg to be ridiculed. She has claimed to be “privy” to classified information that China has a “strategic plan to take over America”; she has stated that masturbation is equivalent to adultery and should therefore be forbidden; and she has maintained that cloning researchers have produced “mice with fully functioning human brains.” O’Donnell has complained of “character assassination” by the media. I think she’s right; furthermore, she’s clearly vulnerable and naïve. (The canny Sarah Palin came up with good advice: “explain what the real witchcraft and voodoo politics and economics is and that’s what’s going on in D.C.”)
But let’s not overlook the fact that O’Donnell is running for high political office. It’s not just a case of “if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen”—the question is whether O’Donnell and some of the others running this year belong anywhere near the “kitchen” to begin with. But even if that’s so, shouldn’t they be judged on their thoughts about—and possible solutions for—the problems facing their constituents today, rather than statements made years ago?
Poorly qualified candidates tarnish the images of other women who have studied and worked hard to prepare themselves for public service. We should consider the possibility that politicians who favor repealing or gutting programs that protect women may be furthering their agenda by promoting women candidates who undermine the position, stature, and respect that women have earned for themselves over the past decades.
When The Atlantic titled Hannah Rosin’s cover story “The End of Men,” they knew they’d get a flurry of reactions in the media and they have. Below, watch Katie Couric talk to Gloria Steinem and the Women’s Media Center’s Jehmu Greene about why the title’s a red herring — and why women’s greater workforce participation hasn’t yet translated into equality, let alone dominance.
I recently came up with an idea: that it would be revelatory to ask as many women who were willing to “nominate” our next world leaders to choose who, among women, they’d put forward to lead the world. This seems more apt than ever, given last week’s decision by the Supreme Court, which may guarantee even more corporate sponsorship of our elected officials.
Is your present Supreme Court not delivering on its promise to you as a U.S.citizen, in its responsibility to adjudicate, interpret and set in place the law of the land, according to the Constitution?
For example, do you think that ExxonMobil, Inc. or General Electric qualify as “persons”? A person who might, say, end up standing with you in the unemployment line? Who might hold your hand with its own “human” mitts when your health insurance claim is denied by other corporations called big insurance companies (who are, according to the Court, “people” too)? Do you think EXXON or AIG or (name any other big corporation) will place their little flesh-paws over the hand that rocks the cradle?
Before we cue the violins to play Barbra singing “People Who Need Corporate People,” how about this: a little speculation about another kind of Nine? Another kind of court: worldwide, and populated by women. Not corporate faux-protoplasm propping up those already in power, but living women, nominated by other women. They just might come up with some new ways to interpret what it is to be human, and what it means to take responsibility for saving the world.
At dinner one night, I tried on the idea with WVFC co-founder Laura Baudo Sillerman and a few others. Then I asked a few more women, then a few more, and finally published the first names on the Huffington Post. I’m hoping that many more women will weigh in. My assistant, Diana Arterian, and I will tabulate the results. Then, on this page and elsewhere, we’ll announce THE NINE, an “international court” of nine women who could spin the world back on its axis and maybe even save us.
What do you think? Is it time for us to start imagining a new kind of world, since this one ain’t working? Is it time for us to try a different approach — say, give the other gender a chance at running things?
Most of the handful of women I polled, of all ages, would like to see women given a chance at piloting the ship for a while. We’ve had men in the majority in just about every area of governance and power — everywhere on the planet. If women were in charge, would things improve? How about The Nine, an international court of women, enlightened governance?
Please respond by nominating one or two or nine women who you think could take charge and give us a chance to save ourselves and the planet. At a certain point, I’ll tally the results to see who The Nine are, but we are not so interested in how many votes any single “candidate” gets as which names appear.
By the way, here are just a few of the names I’ve gotten so far. (We’ve added links to WVFC stories when possible, and Wikipedia when not. — Ed.) So add your votes for them as well, if you like — and still, please, give us at least one more.
UPDATE: Nominations for Nine Women to Run the World will be considered complete on February 14, 2010. If you have not yet “cast your vote” – please do it soon!
- Hillary Clinton (Secretary of State, U.S.)
- Michelle Obama (First Lady, U.S.)
- Mary McAleese (President, Ireland)
- Ellen Johnson Sirleaf (President, Liberia)
- Barbara Boxer (U.S. Senator, California)
- Ariana Huffington (Journalist, Activist, Founder, Huffington Post)
- Margaret Thatcher (Former Prime Minister, U.K.)
- Victoria Donda (Argentinian Politician)
- Melinda French Gates (Philanthropist)
- Shirin Ebadi (founder, Center for Human Rights in Iran)
- Sheila Bair (chair, FDIC)
- Elizabeth Warren (Law Professor)
- Anousheh Ansari (Business Entrepreneur)
- Esther Dyson (Journalist, Philanthropist)
- Adrienne Rich (Poet)
- Azar Nafisi (Author, Professor)
- Sylvia Earle (Oceanographer)
- Sandra Day O’Connor (Former Supreme Court Justice, U.S.)
- Aung San Suu Kyi (Nobel Laureate, Activist, Myanmar)
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Supreme Court Justice, U.S.)
- Isabel Allende (Author, Activist)
- Caroline Kennedy (Philanthropist, Author)
- Jane Goodall (Anthropologist, Author)
- Toni Morrison (Nobel Laureate, Author)
- Wislawa Szymborska (Nobel Laureate, Poet)
- Noor al-Hussein (Queen of Jordan, Philanthropist)
- Sonia Sotomayor (Supreme Court Justice, U.S.)
- Kathleen Sebelius (U.S. Government Official)
- Maria Shriver (First Lady, California, Author)
- Mary Robinson (Former President, Ireland)
- Fran Pavley (Environmentalist, Activist)
- Gloria Steinem (Journalist, Activist)
- Nadine Strossen (Lawyer, Former President of the ACLU)
- Amy Lehman (Doctor, Activist)
- Karen Armstrong (Author)
- Edwidge Danticat (Author, MacArthur Fellow, Haitian)
- Oprah Winfrey (Television Talk Show Host, Philanthropist)
- Eve Ensler (Author, V-Day Founder)
- Marsha Moss (Public Art Curator)
- Rachel Maddow (Rhodes Scholar, Public Health Ph.D., MSNBC host).
- Maxine Singer (Biochemist, Former President, Carnegie Institute)
- Madeleine Albright (Former U.S. Secretary of State)
- Martha Coakley (Attorney General, Massachusetts)
- Patricia Strachen (Editor)
- Vandana Shiva (Physicist, Philosopher, Eco Feminist, Activist, and Author)
- Medha Patkar (Social Activist)
- Hu Shuli (Journalist)
- Esther Dyson (Journalist, Philanthropist)
- Margaret Wheatley (President of the Berkana Institute)
- Vicki Flaugher (Entrepreneur)
- Dr. Jane Lubchenco (Sec. of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Admin.)
- Reverend Alexia Salvatierra (Exec. Dir. of Clergy & Laity United for Economic Justice of California)
- Dr. Holmes Hummel (Dept. of Energy)
- Alisa Gravitz (Founder of Green America)
- Sheila Kuehl (Former U.S. Senator and Assemblywoman)
- Constance “Connie” Rice (Civil Rights Activist, Lawyer)
- Kavita Ramdas (Head of the Global Fund for Women)
- Louise Arbour (Former UN Human Rights High Commissioner and Canadian Supreme Court Justice)
Please add your nomination. Nominate your mother, your sister, your mentors and neighbors. Just let us know in the comments section below. Who should we be following?
Thanks for adding a name — even your own.
Carol Muske-Dukes, Poet Laureate of California, is a novelist, the author of seven books of poetry, and an essayist and activist. She also writes for The New York Times Op-ed page and book reviews, and is a former poetry columnist for the LA Times. Ms. Muske-Dukes is a founding Director of the Ph.D. Program in Literature and Creative Writing at the University of Southern California, where she is a professor. Join her California Poet Laureate project, The Magic Poetry Bus: http://magicpoetrybus.org!
We at WVFC have been excited about Maria Shriver’s A Woman’s Nation project, which is being highlghted this weeek on NBC-TV. (At the bottom of the post, see Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm talk to Shriver on the Today Show.) Look here tomorrow for word from our own Diane Vacca, evaluating the new report issued this week by Shriver and her team.
Now, via our sisters at Women’s Media Center, we offer some words on the project from the woman who first taught many of us to stand up for our place in the world. Read below (including the link to WMC), and then let us know in comments: Do you think she’s right? What do you hope the Shriver report will do? How do you plan to be included? (Ed.)
You’re going to be seeing a multimedia blitz about a new national study of women’s status called The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Changes Everything. Gloria Steinem gives you a preview of this project created by Maria Shriver and a D.C. think tank, and suggests ways you can use it and also judge its success.
For the first time in the history of the United States, half of all people on payrolls are women. This big landmark is the centerpiece of The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Changes Everything, a newly released 400-plus page study that includes a national poll of changing attitudes among women and men, and two dozen essays from experts on various aspects of women’s status, provided free office space and other in-kind support, will make it the subject of a week of television programming.
The creators of this campaign to launch a national conversation are Maria Shriver, who lent her skill at cross-country interviewing and wisdom from running the California Women’s Conference, plus the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank self-described as a source of progressive ideas, and headed by John Podesta, former chief-of-staff for President Bill Clinton. The result is a freestanding project with Rockefeller Foundation and other private support, and also a very conscious echo of a government commission and report on the status of American women that was ordered up by Shriver’s uncle, President John F. Kennedy, almost 50 years ago. Headed by Eleanor Roosevelt, it set up state commissions that led to the founding of the National Organization for Women.
Will this $250,000 poll and estimated $2 million project succeed in creating real change where so many others have failed? The report itself headlines such warnings as “Plenty of study, few results: Real family friendly workplace reform is long overdue.” It lists some of the many prestigious calls for, say, a national system of childcare; an area in which every other modern democracy has long done better than the United States. In the Nixon era when women were a third of the paid labor force, for instance, Congress passed childcare legislation, only to see it vetoed as “family-weakening.” Now that women are half of all workers with incomes that are necessary to 80 percent of families—indeed, 40 percent of babies are now born to single mothers—childcare is still nowhere on the list of priorities in Congress, and we have also become the only industrialized country without any requirement of paid family leave.
To read the rest of Steinem’s call to action, click here.
Gloria Steinem travels widely as a feminist activist, organizer, writer and lecturer. She is co-founder of the Women’s Media Center, and a board member of Equality Now, a group that advocates for women’s rights globally. She was an editor of The Reader’s Companion to U.S. Women’s History and a member of the Beyond Racism Initiative, a comparative study of racial patterns in the United States, South Africa, and Brazil.
Steinem co-founded New York magazine and Ms. magazine, where she continues to serve as a consulting editor. She helped to found the National Women’s Political Caucus and Choice USA, and was the founding president of the Ms. Foundation for Women where she helped to create Take Our Daughters to Work Day. She has also co-produced a documentary on child abuse for HBO. Her books include the bestsellers Revolution from Within: A Book of Self-Esteem; Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions; Moving Beyond Words; and Marilyn: Norma Jean, on the life of Marilyn Monroe.
Naturally one would weep at a birthday party for a icon who calls upon everyone there to be outrageous.
Weep people did last night, at one of many celebrations of Gloria Steinem’s 75th birthday at the home of her dear friend Marlo Thomas. Steinem was as funny as inspiring as when she told students at Smith College’s commencement:
many words we could type a minute, a question that was never asked of
then all-male students at Harvard or Princeton. Female-only typing was
rationalized by supposedly greater female verbal skills, attention to
detail, smaller fingers, goodness knows what, but the public
imagination just didn’t include male typists, certainly not Ivy
League-educated ones. Now
computers have come along, and ‘typing’ is ‘keyboarding’. Suddenly,
voila!—men can type! Gives you faith in men’s ability to change,
This post is an invitation to be a fly on the wall of last night’s party. But first, it is also to alert you that you are also probably about to throw a party of your own.
The site Ms. Foundation has created in honor of Gloria turning 75 has all the instructions. It calls upon all women to have an outrageous party, and it includes a party kit.
But wait, there’s more. Here’s what Gloria wants from us:
“Because I have reached the outrageous age of 75, I feel I can call upon people to do an outrageous act every day for 75 days.” One very demure woman asked, “would a subtle upheaval do?” The answer came back: “No! Outrageous is what is called for.”
- Another woman who has a regular gig on CNN (and who is married to a minister) decided she would wear her Wonder Woman T-shirt under her proper business attire and then unbutton her blouse to display it on the air.
- A conventionally dressed older woman said she’d be showing her tattoo regularly.
- A stunning singer stood and led everyone in chanting the name Gloria over and over in different keys at different tempos. She then sang over the chant about the glory of Gloria.
There was weeping.
During the toasts a young woman stood and said that she didn’t know where she would be without Gloria’s example. She said that knowing about the battles carried out by Gloria and the other leaders of the women’s movement was the only way she could have possibly believed — in herself, in the possibility of a career, in the respect she now realizes all people are owed. People wept.
Another woman stood and said that though she knew Gloria hates to be called an icon, she had to tell her she had been an icon around her house when she was growing up— the bad kind! Her father (famous—but names are being omitted to protect the guilty here) would say things like, “you’re going to grow up to be like that
Gloria Steinem!” as if it was the worst damnation he could imagine.*
People laughed till they wept.
Someone told this story: In the first building where Ms. had their offices someone went to the elevator operator and asked “Is it true that this is the building where Gertrude Stein works?”
Marlo Thomas spoke about the time Gloria asked her to go to Detroit to speak to welfare mothers. Marlo protested that they would hate her, she was not on welfare, she was not a mother. She represented everything those women would resent. Gloria said, “trust me. They’ll love you.” Marlo Thomas went and what happened was they loved each other. She wasn’t a welfare mother, but they were all women and she said it was a transformative moment for her and her commitment to women’s rights.
The weeping went on.
A ten-minute video shown at the event outlined the trajectory of a woman’s life and the arc of Steinem’s. It told the story of what was once an improbable belief, in a movement that would insist on worldwide equality for all people and what would become part of the standard for human rights. It showed women who are no longer here. It showed marching and laughter and cajoling and, most of all, deep connection.
There was a palpable connection among the women who were present at the creation of the outrageous notion that there should be equal opportunity, equal protection and equal pay for women and therefore for all quadrants in society. It connects us all. The video also showed Gloria looking exquisite when she was young — as she sat there still looking exquisite, in a long black dress and cowgirl boots, when she no longer is.
It showed us ourselves. For we are nothing if not the repositories of the history that has taken place in our lifetimes. It was enough to make you weep.
The occasion of this birthday should make us all want to go out and do something outrageous. I hope everyone reading this does just that. In celebration of the life of one very purposeful woman and the sense of purpose and possibility she’s added to each of ours.
*(He likely meant both Steinem as undercover Playboy Bunny in the photo on the right, and as the 1972 radical feminist, left — Ed.)
This wasn’t a dream. It really happened. Last night at the New York Society for Ethical Culture, New York celebrated the life of the amazing man from Missouri who made New York his own, the man referred to more than once as “now a Celestial Editor”, that icon of magazine editors, Clay Felker.
In a Los Angeles Times column, feminist leader Gloria Steinem weighs in on the selection of Sarah Palin:
But here is even better news: It won’t work. This isn’t the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere. It’s not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It’s about baking a new pie.
Is Kamala Harris California’s Future Governor?; Steinem Schools the Financial Times; Dara Torres Inspires Boomer Women to Push Harder
From courtroom to the campaign trail to….a governor’s mansion? This week’s MORE Magazine profile of Kamala Harris, the 44-year-old San Francisco district attorney who counts among her law-school buddies a certain Illinois senator:
“I got things to do too,” she teases, effortlessly dialing up the street in her cadence as she slips into scolding-auntie mode. “You think I don’t have enough things to do as district attorney of San
Francisco?” The young man, grinning sheepishly, is by now getting into his car, escaping from this petite, down-coated stranger. But Harris manages to get in a last word. “It’s one night in a lifetime,” shecalls through his window. “People fought and died for the right to vote, you know?”
All that chutzpah, charm, and relentlessness have propelled Harris, 43,through an impressive legal career and into the rising-star ranks of the national Democratic party. Like Barack Obama, a close friend from law school circles, Kamala Harris has an irresistible,superlative-laced narrative that’s all about defying conventions.
The daughter of Berkeley civil rights activists, Harris was raised by a forceful single mother and bucked her family’s liberal sensibilities tobecome a prosecutor. In her first run at elective office, the 2003 race for DA, she thumped her former boss, a man almost 30 years her senior, to become the first female, the first African-American, and the first Indian-American chief law enforcement officer in the most liberal city of the most populous state.
As a leader of a growing group of law-and-order liberals, Harris wants to redefine criminal justice and keep her party’s nominee from falling into the usual traps. “Democrats often give the impression that we just want to open the jailhouse door and let everybody out,” says Harris, who learned this the hard way from a death penalty controversy in her first term. “The public wants to know that we can keep them safe. If it’s always the Republicans or conservatives who come up with the plan, we will lose the debate. The old paradigm isn’t working: ‘Are you soft on crime or hard on crime?’ We should be asking, ‘Are you smart on crime?’”
Not for a millisecond: This week’s Financial Times features not one but two items featuring feminist icon Gloria Steinem: a full reprint of her classic 1972 undercover expose “I Was a Playboy Bunny,” and a real-time interview of Steinem by the FT’s young managing editor, Chrystia Freeland. Discussing the significance of Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, Freeland asked Steinem whether Clinton’s rise might be less significant as a victory for women than as a sign of the power of dynasties:
I press the dynastic point a few more times and Steinem offers more rebuttals. I think we are both relieved when the waitress interrupts to take our order. Steinem, a vegetarian, chooses the specials – chilled corn chowder and a salad of avocado with black rice and shiitake mushrooms. I pick the market plate with tofu, spinach, cauliflower and mushrooms. Born in Toledo, Ohio, she has made her home in New York for many years and tells me the restaurant is one of her favourite local hang-outs…
Everyone nourished, we are back to the 2008 election. Steinem is supporting Obama in the general race. “Women are more than smart enough to see that McCain’s policies are a disaster … He is anti every reproductive issue we’ve ever fought for.”
She believes women will vote for Obama even if Clinton doesn’t get the much-mooted consolation prize of the vice-president’s spot on the Democratic ticket – a job Steinem doesn’t think is good enough for her anyway. Why? “It’s not an independent position, to put it mildly. I would rather see her as the president of the Senate.”
For a sense of Steinem’s completely undiminished vigor, here she is campaigning for Hillary in Texas:
Jumping back in the pool: 41-year-old swimmer Dara Torres,has hypnotized the media (including us) even before she competes in Beijing. And she has also, according to the Boston Globe, spurred many boomer women to some serious swimming:
But even before she swims in Beijing, Torres, who is ancient by
Olympic standards, has turned this expectation on its tail: She’s
inspired older female swimmers to push harder at their sport. New
England has a sizeable population of competitive women swimmers in
their 40s, 50s, and into their 80s, many of them members of United
States Masters Swimming (USMS), a national organization that sponsors
regional, national, and international competitions.
They include 51-year-old Gayle Wettach of Wakefield, who won a Masters world record last year in her age group for
the 100-meter individual medley with a time of 1:15.24. There’s Jacki
Hirsty, 55, of Providence who owns SwimSmart, which offers personal
aquatic training: She holds the Masters national record for the
50-meter freestyle (28.54). Beth Estel, 52, a consultant at the Lahey
Clinic in Burlington, took first place in May in the Masters national
competition for 50-yard breaststroke (34.21). Billie
Ann Burrill, 87, of Providence ranked fourth in the world in 2006 in
the 100-meter freestyle (2:01.85)
Many of these older swimmers say that despite the prevailing
attitude that competitive sports are a young person’s game, Torres has
showcased something they’ve known a long time: With swimming, a
low-impact sport, it’s possible for women who keep pushing themselves
to reach an advanced age, clock extraordinary swim times, and remain as
cutthroat and competitive as ever.
“The impact on weight-bearing joints such as the ankle, knee, and
hip are much less with swimming as compared to a weight-bearing sport
such as running,” said Michael E. Rogers, research director of the
Center for Physical Activity and Aging at Wichita State University in
Torres, the mother of a 2-year-old, has won nine Olympic medals; she
retired from swimming and returned three times. At the Olympic trials
earlier this summer, she broke the American record twice in the
50-meter freestyle. In Beijing she’ll swim that event plus the 400
freestyle and 400 medley races.
By Chris Lombardi